<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://news.gourt.com/Analysis-and-Opinion.html">
<title>Analysis_and_Opinion RSS : Gourt</title>
<link>http://news.gourt.com/Analysis-and-Opinion.html</link>
<description></description>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:rights>Copyright 2007, Gourt.com</dc:rights>
<dc:date>2008-09-04T22:54+38:00
</dc:date>
<dc:publisher>rtruog@gourt.com</dc:publisher>
<dc:creator>rtruog@gourt.com</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Analysis_and_Opinion RSS : Gourt</dc:subject>
<syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
<syn:updateFrequency>1</syn:updateFrequency>
<syn:updateBase>1901-01-01T00:00+00:00</syn:updateBase>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://feeds.chicagotribune.com/~r/chicagotribune/opinion/~3/136466034/chi-cartoons-storylink,0,3955617.storylink" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://feeds.chicagotribune.com/~r/chicagotribune/opinion/~3/218309914/chi-zorn-link,0,2822778.storylink" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://feeds.chicagotribune.com/~r/chicagotribune/opinion/~3/383230080/chi-kass-rnc-04sep04,0,2646817.column" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://feeds.chicagotribune.com/~r/chicagotribune/opinion/~3/383230081/chi-bazer-htmllink,0,6377950.storylink" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://feeds.chicagotribune.com/~r/chicagotribune/opinion/~3/383230082/chi-oped0904chapmansep04,0,3416151.column" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://feeds.chicagotribune.com/~r/chicagotribune/opinion/~3/150591725/chi-editorials-link,0,7658810.storylink" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/383302709/displaystory.cfm" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/383342097/displaystory.cfm" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/383207820/displaystory.cfm" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/383191638/displaystory.cfm" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/380380298/displaystory.cfm" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/382469930/displaystory.cfm" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/383257654/displaystory.cfm" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/382256273/displaystory.cfm" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/382256274/displaystory.cfm" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/381512245/displaystory.cfm" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/382382124/displaystory.cfm" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/381324582/displaystory.cfm" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/381296476/displaystory.cfm" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/382382125/displaystory.cfm" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/382382126/displaystory.cfm" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/380552831/displaystory.cfm" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/12/relaunching_the_roundup.html?nav=rss_blog" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/12/jimmy_carter_palestinian_sympa.html?nav=rss_blog" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/12/beyond_civil_war_lebanons_choi_1.html?nav=rss_blog" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/11/world_opinion_roundup_hiatus.html?nav=rss_blog" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/11/nasrallahs_brinksmanship_1.html?nav=rss_blog" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/11/doubting_baker.html?nav=rss_blog" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/11/futile_ritual_seen_in_us_veto.html?nav=rss_blog" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/11/in_rumsfelds_fall_hope_and_rec.html?nav=rss_blog" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/11/sandinistas_set_to_join_chavez.html?nav=rss_blog" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/11/in_arab_world_bitterness_over.html?nav=rss_blog" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/11/saddams_sentence_1.html?nav=rss_blog" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/11/the_cauldron_of_oaxaca.html?nav=rss_blog" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/10/firestorm_over_australian_cler.html?nav=rss_blog" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/10/tensions_in_latin_america_over.html?nav=rss_blog" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/10/more_on_counting_civilian_casu.html?nav=rss_blog" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://feeds.chicagotribune.com/~r/chicagotribune/opinion/~3/136466034/chi-cartoons-storylink,0,3955617.storylink">
<title>

        Editorial cartoons</title>
<link>http://feeds.chicagotribune.com/~r/chicagotribune/opinion/~3/136466034/chi-cartoons-storylink,0,3955617.storylink</link>
<description><![CDATA[
   
]]></description>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://feeds.chicagotribune.com/~r/chicagotribune/opinion/~3/218309914/chi-zorn-link,0,2822778.storylink">
<title>

        Eric Zorn: Equal time rules at this book club</title>
<link>http://feeds.chicagotribune.com/~r/chicagotribune/opinion/~3/218309914/chi-zorn-link,0,2822778.storylink</link>
<description><![CDATA[
   
]]></description>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://feeds.chicagotribune.com/~r/chicagotribune/opinion/~3/383230080/chi-kass-rnc-04sep04,0,2646817.column">
<title>

        Palin&#x27;s small-town ways will play big</title>
<link>http://feeds.chicagotribune.com/~r/chicagotribune/opinion/~3/383230080/chi-kass-rnc-04sep04,0,2646817.column</link>
<description><![CDATA[S T. PAUL &#8212; Sarah Joan of Arc isn't as catchy as Sarah Barracuda, yet even so, the throng called for her to lead them, an unknown from the edge of nowhere, a woman with no experience in the great city of light.

   
]]></description>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://feeds.chicagotribune.com/~r/chicagotribune/opinion/~3/383230081/chi-bazer-htmllink,0,6377950.storylink">
<title>

        Mark Bazer: Obama&#x27;s letter to celebs: Go away</title>
<link>http://feeds.chicagotribune.com/~r/chicagotribune/opinion/~3/383230081/chi-bazer-htmllink,0,6377950.storylink</link>
<description><![CDATA[
   
]]></description>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://feeds.chicagotribune.com/~r/chicagotribune/opinion/~3/383230082/chi-oped0904chapmansep04,0,3416151.column">
<title>

        How Palin subverts McCain&#x27;s message</title>
<link>http://feeds.chicagotribune.com/~r/chicagotribune/opinion/~3/383230082/chi-oped0904chapmansep04,0,3416151.column</link>
<description><![CDATA[T he last few days have offered some startling revelations about a running mate&#8212;Sarah Palin's running mate. For months, Republicans have been asking the ominous question: How well do we know  Barack Obama ? The GOP nominee's vice presidential choice raises another one: How well do we know John McCain?

   
]]></description>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://feeds.chicagotribune.com/~r/chicagotribune/opinion/~3/150591725/chi-editorials-link,0,7658810.storylink">
<title>

        Editorials: A triple-bogey blunder, more</title>
<link>http://feeds.chicagotribune.com/~r/chicagotribune/opinion/~3/150591725/chi-editorials-link,0,7658810.storylink</link>
<description><![CDATA[
   
]]></description>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/383302709/displaystory.cfm">
<title>Carmakers cut emissions</title>
<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/383302709/displaystory.cfm</link>
<description><![CDATA[Faced with big penalties, carmakers are improving efficiencyTHERE is nothing like high oil prices and swingeing new penalties on carbon-spewing vehicles to concentrate the minds of carmakers. The European Commission plans to impose penalties on companies by 2012 if their fleets emit over 130 grams of carbon dioxide per km (g/km). After much complaining about the technical impossibility of compliance (especially from German makers of big luxury cars), companies have got on with rolling out new technologies to improve efficiency. BMW cut its average fleet emissions by 7.3% last year by using &#8220;efficient dynamics&#8221; across its range, according to T&amp;E, a transport think-tank. Many carmakers saw little improvement, partly because cars got 10kg heavier on average. PSA Peugeot-Citroen and Renault are best placed to meet the 2012 target. ...
   
]]></description>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/383342097/displaystory.cfm">
<title>BP and its Russian partners strike a deal</title>
<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/383342097/displaystory.cfm</link>
<description><![CDATA[BP and its Russian partners appear to make up and vow to move onLITTLE more than a week after Russia&#8217;s government had declared itself ready for a new cold war, one big foreign investor has emerged intact from a nasty dispute with its local partners and the authorities. TNK-BP, an oil company that produces 1.6m barrels a day and which is owned jointly by Britain's BP and Russian private investors, AlfaAccessRenova (AAR), was for months paralysed by war in the boardroom. The Russian investors, unhappy at the way the company has been run by Bob Dudley, an American appointed by BP, blocked the renewal of work permits for many foreign staff. This included Mr Dudley, who since late July has tried to direct TNK-BP from a secret location abroad. Despite denials, Russia&#8217;s tax and immigration inspectors seemed to be helping AAR. BP looked poised to join the ranks of foreign oil companies forced to sell stakes in big projects, on the cheap, to Kremlin-friendly concerns. On Thursday September 4th, however, the two sides agreed to make up. BP&#8217;s 50% stake appears to be safe. Mr Dudley will go at the end of this year, to be replaced by a BP nominee who must be approved by the board. One AAR director and one BP director will also depart, making way for three independents. Much could depend on how independent these individuals really are. The squabbling management committee will be shrunk and the most disruptive members thrown out. In time, as much as 20% of the venture could be sold in an initial public offering (IPO)&#8212;if both partners, plus Russia&#8217;s regulators, agree. ...
   
]]></description>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/383207820/displaystory.cfm">
<title>Europe.view</title>
<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/383207820/displaystory.cfm</link>
<description><![CDATA[Naming the stand-off between Russia and the WestDEFINING the beginning and end of the old cold war&#8212;let alone is the issues at stake&#8212;is tricky. Did it start with Lenin? With Stalin? Or with the Iron Curtain&#8217;s erection in Europe at the end of the second world war? And when did it end? With the Helsinki Accords of 1973, or with Mikhail Gorbachev&#8217;s glasnost and perestroika?Historians can quibble indefinitely, but a rough definition might be that the cold war was an era of rivalry, both military and ideological, between two global superpowers. It started with the Berlin airlift of 1948, and petered out in the 1980s. ...
   
]]></description>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/383191638/displaystory.cfm">
<title>An Orange divorce?</title>
<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/383191638/displaystory.cfm</link>
<description><![CDATA[Ukraine&#8217;s pro-Western coalition is unravellingUkraine&#8217;s government, comprising the allies from the Orange Revolution, is poised to collapse after the prime minister, Yuliya Tymoshenko, allied with the opposition to strip the presidency of its powers. It is not clear whether Ms Tymoshenko has done this to pressure the president to back her policies, to boost her power as an alternative to seeking the presidency herself, or to trigger her departure from government ahead of tough economic times&#8212;and with an eye on the 2010 presidential election. The coalition could yet be saved, or a new one established; failing that, a parliamentary election must be held. With political tensions high in the wake of Russia&#8217;s attack on Georgia, the timing could hardly be worse.On September 2nd the pro-presidential Our Ukraine-People's Self-Defence (OU-PSD) voted to leave its coalition with the Yuliya Tymoshenko Bloc (YTB), bringing the "Orange" government, which was only formed in late 2007 following an early parliamentary election, to the verge of collapse. ...
   
]]></description>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/380380298/displaystory.cfm">
<title>The Republican National Convention</title>
<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/380380298/displaystory.cfm</link>
<description><![CDATA[Daily dispatches from St PaulTHE most important feature of this year&#8217;s Republican convention is not its location, purpose or personalities. It is timing: for the first time in decades, the two parties convene in successive weeks. While most people celebrate the Labour Day holiday at home, the journalist class will arrive in St. Paul barely having recovered from Denver: the heat, the death-march-length walk from the security perimeter to the Pepsi Centre, the lack of seats, the alcohol. ...
   
]]></description>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/382469930/displaystory.cfm">
<title>Waste generation</title>
<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/382469930/displaystory.cfm</link>
<description><![CDATA[The rubbish mountains growOVER 2.1 billion tonnes of rubbish were dumped around the world last year. Rich countries are the most wasteful, with each person chucking away 1.4kg of solid trash every day, but this has levelled off in recent years as the rich try to create less of it and to recycle more. As poorer nations grow richer they will produce more waste. In 2004 China surpassed America as the largest producer of rubbish: by 2030 it will be churning out nearly 500m tonnes a year. ...
   
]]></description>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/383257654/displaystory.cfm">
<title>Google launches a new web browser</title>
<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/383257654/displaystory.cfm</link>
<description><![CDATA[Google&#8217;s new web browser is its most direct attack on Microsoft yetSEVERAL years ago, Silicon Valley was rife with rumours that Google, then primarily a search engine, might be building a new web browser to rival that of Microsoft, called Internet Explorer (IE), or even an operating system to rival Microsoft&#8217;s Windows. Google mocked those rumours and they died down. But if Sergey Brin, Google&#8217;s co-founder, is to be believed, the speculation itself made him think that &#8220;maybe it&#8217;s not a bad idea&#8221;. And so this week Google did launch a new browser, called Chrome, that is also, in effect, a new operating system. The rumours, says Mr Brin cheekily, &#8220;just happened to migrate from being false to being true.&#8221;Chrome amounts to a declaration of war&#8212;albeit a pre-emptive one, in Google&#8217;s mind&#8212;against Microsoft. So far, Google has been coy about admitting the rivalry (whereas Microsoft&#8217;s boss, Steve Ballmer, is obsessed with it). In web search and advertising, Google dominates roughly as Microsoft does in operating systems and office applications. To the extent that Google has challenged Microsoft&#8217;s core business at all, it is through its web-based word-processing, spreadsheet and presentation applications. But these, so far, have few users.  ...
   
]]></description>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/382256273/displaystory.cfm">
<title>Asia.view</title>
<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/382256273/displaystory.cfm</link>
<description><![CDATA[But a few reasons for hope in KashmirNOT so long ago, Kashmir seemed a rarity among the globe&#8217;s interminable, intractable conflicts, in that it actually seemed to be improving. It was no longer cited as the conflagration most likely to spark a nuclear war. The two countries contesting sovereignty&#8212;India and Pakistan&#8212;were not about to resolve their dispute; yet, slowly but surely, they were building better relations.The international press ran articles about peace settling on the area most scarred by bloodshed&#8212;the Indian-administered, Muslim-majority Kashmir valley. Tourists were returning, lolling on houseboats on the magical lakes, skiing in the gorgeous mountains, or enjoying a golfing paradise. ...
   
]]></description>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/382256274/displaystory.cfm">
<title>Labour rations in the Gulf</title>
<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/382256274/displaystory.cfm</link>
<description><![CDATA[Gulf Arab states are fretting at the rising number of foreign workersGovernments in the booming Gulf Arab states are becoming increasingly anxious at the erosion of their national cultures, as their growing economies suck in ever-larger numbers of expatriate workers. They are now devising a range of measures to limit the growth of segments of the expatriate population&#8212;in particular those at the less skilled end of the spectrum&#8212;while not impinging on the continued expansion of their economies. The concerns call into question the entire basis of the Gulf development model, entailing ambitious targets for economic growth and diversification, which cannot feasibly be achieved without a substantial increase in the expatriate population.The problem is most clearly evident in the United Arab Emirates, where expatriates account for more than 90% of the private-sector labour force, and where the population is thought to have grown by almost one-third over the past three-four years. According to the most recent census, whose results were published in 2005, the UAE's population was 4.3m; it is now generally estimated to be about 6m. The UAE government announced in early September that it is setting up a national demographic agency that will be tasked with finding ways to slow down the growth of expatriate labour imports. Among the initial measures that have been proposed is a scheme to allow students who are enrolled in UAE universities and who are the children of foreign residents to take up part-time jobs. This measure appears to be targeted at children of long-term residents from other Arab countries, who have more cultural affinities with Emiratis than do Asian and European residents, who predominate in the expatriate community. The students would be expected to gravitate towards semi-skilled jobs in the services sector that tend to be performed by Asians. ...
   
]]></description>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/381512245/displaystory.cfm">
<title>Investors from the Middle East buy Manchester City football club</title>
<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/381512245/displaystory.cfm</link>
<description><![CDATA[More upheaval in English football, as investors from the Middle East spend $360m on Manchester CityFANS were surprised, in 2003, when a little-known Russian oil billionaire splashed out $226m for Chelsea football club. These days foreigners spending fortunes on English clubs is far more common. The Premier League has become the richest and most famous in the world. On Tuesday September 2nd, Manchester City, a mid-table team, changed hands for the second time in little over a year. Abu Dhabi United Group, a Middle-Eastern consortium backed by oil-rich royals, will pay $360m for the club, quite an improvement on the $165m paid in 2007. We have left out another club, Derby County, which was bought for some $100m in January but relegated in June. ...
   
]]></description>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/382382124/displaystory.cfm">
<title>The Republican convention is battered, but gets under way</title>
<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/382382124/displaystory.cfm</link>
<description><![CDATA[The Republican convention, though battered, goes aheadIT HAS been a rocky week for the Republican Party, as its convention gets under way in St Paul, Minnesota. After the focus on the Democrats last week, John McCain snatched back attention at the weekend with his choice of Sarah Palin, the young governor of Alaska, as his running mate. But little since that announcement has gone according to plan.The first difficulty was Hurricane Gustav which crossed the Gulf of Mexico before hitting Louisiana on Monday September 1st. The storm provoked memories of Katrina, the hurricane which drowned New Orleans in 2005 and whose aftermath was mishandled by George Bush&#8217;s administration. Nearly 2m people left their homes in Louisiana this week, fleeing the storm. And as a result of the upheaval, Mr Bush and his vice-president, Dick Cheney, decided to stay away from the Republican convention, scrapping planned speeches. Mr McCain was no doubt relieved: the less he is associated with the deeply unpopular incumbent, the happier he will be. ...
   
]]></description>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/381324582/displaystory.cfm">
<title>A construction slump in Ireland hurts workers</title>
<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/381324582/displaystory.cfm</link>
<description><![CDATA[Workers in Ireland are struggling, hit especially by a slump in constructionThe effects on Ireland's labour market of a deep slump in the construction sector are becoming increasingly stark. Second-quarter data from the Central Statistics Office show that job creation has almost stagnated, with the numbers in employment increasing by just 0.3% year on year in the second quarter of 2008. This represents a sharp slowdown from a rate of 4% recorded for the same period a year earlier, and that of 2.6% in the first three months of the year.While a number of sectors recorded declining employment in the second quarter, the overall weakness of jobs growth was clearly driven by a collapse in the construction sector, where employment fell by 26,800 over the year&#8212;equivalent to 9.5% of the sector's workforce. There were also drops of between 2.5% and 3% in industry, in the hotels and restaurants sector and in the transport, storage and communications industry. Net job creation was confined to a small number of service sectors, mostly in wholesale and retail and in healthcare. ...
   
]]></description>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/381296476/displaystory.cfm">
<title>Business.view</title>
<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/381296476/displaystory.cfm</link>
<description><![CDATA[Innovative things to do with a banana&#8220;BEHOLD, the atheist&#8217;s nightmare,&#8221; declares Ray Comfort, an Australian evangelist, as he holds up a banana in a hugely popular video on YouTube. The fruit, he says, testifies to God&#8217;s creative genius. It comes with a colour-coding system that shows when it is ready to eat (green is too early, black too late); an easily gripped, biodegradable wrapper; and a &#8220;tab at the top&#8221; which, unlike that on a can of soda, works so well that when you pull it &#8220;the contents don&#8217;t squirt in your face.&#8221;Not everyone is convinced. One video response points out that the banana only achieved its user-friendly qualities through evolution over many centuries of farming. ...
   
]]></description>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/382382125/displaystory.cfm">
<title>A state of emergency in Thailand</title>
<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/382382125/displaystory.cfm</link>
<description><![CDATA[The army is called in as pro- and anti-government protesters clashWITH protesters occupying Government House in Bangkok for the past week, several tourist airports being blocked by demonstrators and union leaders calling for strikes to bring down Samak Sundaravej, the prime minister, it had seemed only a matter of time before things turned violent. In the early hours of Tuesday September 2nd, they did. Supporters and opponents of the government armed with a variety of weapons clashed in the capital, leaving one person dead and dozens injured. Mr Samak called a state of emergency, putting the army in charge of security. Rumours in Bangkok in the past few days had suggested that General Anupong Paochinda, the army chief, was resisting Mr Samak&#8217;s request for a state of emergency. If so, the violence changed his mind. The army has a low tolerance for political disorder and has frequently used it as an excuse to seize power. Indeed, Mr Samak has accused his opponents in the People&#8217;s Alliance for Democracy (PAD)&#8212;which is staging the sit-in at Government House&#8212;of trying to provoke another coup, so as to force Mr Samak and his People&#8217;s Power Party (PPP) from office. ...
   
]]></description>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/382382126/displaystory.cfm">
<title>The European Union meets to discuss what to do about Russia</title>
<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/382382126/displaystory.cfm</link>
<description><![CDATA[Europe&#8217;s leaders try to unite against RussiaIF IN doubt, turn to a cliche for help. The French government declared on Monday September 1st that the European Union considers its relations with Russia to be at a &#8220;crossroads&#8221;, because of the crisis in Georgia. That warning&#8212;sounding bold, but rather empty of substance&#8212;captured the mood as 27 leaders arrived in Brussels for an emergency one-day summit devoted to the recent fighting in the Caucasus.Such summits are rare: the last one was called in 2003 to debate the Iraq war. The host, President Nicolas Sarkozy, suggested that the very sight of so many leaders assembling to debate relations with Russia amounted to a strong signal. ...
   
]]></description>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/380552831/displaystory.cfm">
<title>Germany&#x27;s opposition favours greater use of nuclear power</title>
<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/economist/news_analysis_and_views/~3/380552831/displaystory.cfm</link>
<description><![CDATA[If the opposition CDU comes to office in Germany expect an expanded role for nuclear powerVictory for the CDU in the 2009 general election would more than likely herald a turning point in Germany's energy policy in favour of an expansion of nuclear power. Given the high fuel tax burden imposed on German consumers, any impact on electricity prices is likely to be marginal. The benefits to the country's research and development sector could be far more substantial.Germany's amended Nuclear Act, which came into effect in 2002, prohibits the development and construction of new nuclear power plants. It further stipulates that the country's 17 existing plants will be gradually shut down by 2021. This nuclear phase-out is based on a deal negotiated by the Social Democratic Party (SPD) and their former coalition partner, the Green Party. The SPD held on to this agreement when forming the current "grand coalition" government with the Christian Democrats (CDU/CSU) in late 2005. ...
   
]]></description>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/12/relaunching_the_roundup.html?nav=rss_blog">
<title>Relaunching the Roundup</title>
<link>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/12/relaunching_the_roundup.html?nav=rss_blog</link>
<description><![CDATA[World Opinion Roundup is evolving.
 
With the rise of the Internet in the late 1990s, a new global discussion of international news events took shape. The World Opinion Roundup, from its inception in 2001, has sought to leverage an ever-growing online medium to capture different perspectives from throughout the global community for washingtonpost.com readers. Such growth and the advent of blogging have enormously expanded and deepened the discussions surrounding some of the most important issues in the news. It has been a challenge for World Opinion Roundup to keep up. 
 
The inauguration of PostGlobal on washingtonpost.com earlier this year marked a major step toward more comprehensive, in-depth and interactive coverage of these discussions. With the success of PostGlobal, World Opinion Roundup has an opportunity to relaunch with a new and more focused approach, aimed at expanding an informed debate on world news. 

As we revamp World Opinion Roundup to better meet our readers' needs, I will take a break from posting in the coming weeks. I welcome comments and suggestions from you about how the column might be improved -- what you think worked best and what should be improved.  
 
I will return in the New Year with a new and improved feature for following, understanding and participating in global news debates.]]></description>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/12/jimmy_carter_palestinian_sympa.html?nav=rss_blog">
<title>Jimmy Carter, Palestinian Sympathizer</title>
<link>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/12/jimmy_carter_palestinian_sympa.html?nav=rss_blog</link>
<description><![CDATA[Jimmy Carter has emerged as the most prominent pro-Palestinian public figure in America.

In a new book, the former president offers a passionate defense of Palestinian aspirations rarely heard in the U.S. media and unprecedented from someone who once occupied the Oval Office.  

Entitled "Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid," Carter's book has won him praise in the international online media and scathing criticism from U.S.-based Israel supporters. In the Israeli media, the reaction to Carter's defense of Palestinian rights has been more tempered. 

"The bottom line is this," Carter writes in an online excerpt posted by his publisher." "Peace will come to Israel and the Middle East only when the Israeli government is willing to comply with international law, with the Roadmap for Peace, with official American policy, with the wishes of a majority of its own citizens -- and honor its own previous commitments -- by accepting its legal borders. All Arab neighbors must pledge to honor Israel's right to live in peace under these conditions."

In the United States, Carter's linkage of Israeli policy and the now-defunct South African system of racial apartheid has been greeted coolly by fellow Democrats, including incoming House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

"It is wrong to suggest that the Jewish people would support a government in Israel or anywhere else that institutionalizes ethnically based oppression, and Democrats reject that allegation vigorously," Pelosi said. ]]></description>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/12/beyond_civil_war_lebanons_choi_1.html?nav=rss_blog">
<title>Lebanon: Civil War or Nasrallah&#x27;s Peace?</title>
<link>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/12/beyond_civil_war_lebanons_choi_1.html?nav=rss_blog</link>
<description><![CDATA[As Middle East newspapers were warning this weekend that Lebanon is on the brink of civil war, Beirut enjoyed a moment of civility. 

As tens of thousands of anti-government demonstrators began an indefinite occupation of the city's center last weekend, thousands of marathon runners skirted the massive protests without incident.

Amidst the country's worst worst political crisis since the end of a bloody civil war 15 years ago, Lebanon also displays habits of accommodation that some hope will help it avoid the most dire of scenarios. But a peaceful democratic resolution, some commentators say, will most likely benefit the man most antagonistic to Washington and Israel -- Sayyed Nasrallah.

The latest developments show a deepening impasse between the opposition, led by Hezbollah, the Shiite party and militia, and the pro-Western government it seeks to topple. 

&#149; Tensions mounted Monday as thousands turned out to mourn a Shiite demonstrator who was killed during clashes in a Sunni neighborhood Sunday.

&#149;  The government responded to the weekend demonstrations by deploying more troops to the capital to head off the possibility of sectarian violence, according to Aljazeera.net.

&#149; AP reported that Egypt's president and Russia's foreign minister are calling for for calm.

In Lebanon's diverse online media, commentators on both sides proclaim their own peaceful intentions while fearing the worst of the opposition.

Fingerpointing Powers

On Friday, the pro-government Arabic daily Al-Mustaqbal warned that the demonstrations organized by Hezbollah and supported by some Christians were actually the makings of a coup orchestrated by Syria and Iran.

"The direct goal of the Syrian-Iranian coup against the situation in Lebanon is to thwart the [establishment of] an international tribunal [to investigate the assassination of former Lebanese prime minister Rafiq Al-Hariri]," said Al-Mustaqbal, according to a translation by the pro-Israeli Middle East Media Research Institute.

Iran and Syria, said the Sunni daily, also hope to thwart the implementation of U.N. Security Council Resolution 1701, which mandates the disarmament of Hezbollah's militia.

"This is a coup against the very existence of the state. Oh [Lebanese] Army, as of today you face the test of defending the state, the regime, and its institutions," said the Al-Mustaqbal editors.

But Al Manar, Hezbollah's Web site, charges that it is pro-government forces preparing for civil war by distributing guns in the Mount Lebanon region, north of Beirut.

Hezbollah, of course, has its own militia, as Al Manar acknowledged. But "Hezbollah's chief Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah sought on many occasions to reassure the Lebanese that the sole use of the arms of the resistance is to confront the Israeli enemy adding that these weapons will not be used internally," the editors said.

Ya Libnan, a pro-government site, was not reassured.  ]]></description>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/11/world_opinion_roundup_hiatus.html?nav=rss_blog">
<title>World Opinion Roundup Hiatus</title>
<link>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/11/world_opinion_roundup_hiatus.html?nav=rss_blog</link>
<description><![CDATA[Jeff Morley is away temporarily for a family emergency and hopes to resume World Opinion Roundup soon.]]></description>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/11/nasrallahs_brinksmanship_1.html?nav=rss_blog">
<title>Nasrallah&#x27;s Brinksmanship</title>
<link>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/11/nasrallahs_brinksmanship_1.html?nav=rss_blog</link>
<description><![CDATA[It has been just over three months since the United Nations brokered a cease-fire in the month-long war that left Lebanon battered and made Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah a hero to many in the Arab world. 

But Nasrallah's success is costing Lebanon potentially more than the 1,200 civilians killed by Israeli attacks. Commentators see a political quandary that has brought the country to the brink of war.

Nasrallah, supported by a majority of the country's impoverished Shiites, has pitted himself against both Lebanon's pro-Western government and the popular March 14 movement, a coalition of Christian and Arab middle-class groups staunchly against Syrian influence.  

Talks to establish a national unity government broke down when six cabinet ministers aligned with Hezbollah resigned over the weekend. The remaining ministers then approved a plan, opposed by Hezbollah, for an international tribunal to try the assassins of former prime minister Rafiq Hariri. Hezbollah and its Syrian allies want to block the tribunal because U.N. investigators have implicated senior Syrian officials. Hezbollah says that the rebuilding the country is more important than satisfying the demands of the United States and Israel.  

The internal power struggle has broader implications as the U.S. attempts to salvage a deteriorating situation in Iraq, an effort that some say will give leverage to American foes, Iran and Syria. 

Political Impasse

Lebanon's latest power struggles have so far been peaceful, but tense nonetheless. 

Nasrallah is banking on popular demands for rebuilding to trump politics in his push for greater control in Lebanon's government. He predicted Tuesday that Prime Minister Fouad Siniora's administration would fall and a "clean one will replace it" to rebuild areas destroyed by this summer's Israeli assault, according to Almanar.com, Hezbollah's news site. Nasrallah warned that Hezbollah could stage street demonstrations to win public support, but scoffed at talk of civil war.

Siniora has rebuffed Nasrallah's demand for veto power in a national unity government, which he called "tyranny of the minority." ]]></description>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/11/doubting_baker.html?nav=rss_blog">
<title>Doubting Baker</title>
<link>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/11/doubting_baker.html?nav=rss_blog</link>
<description><![CDATA[While many in Washington expect former secretary of state James Baker to engineer a shift in U.S. Iraq policy, a variety of international online commentators doubt he can do it. 

Baker and former Democratic congressman Lee Hamilton lead the Iraq Study Group, a bipartisan panel expected to issue a report in the coming weeks on the rethinking of American strategy in Iraq. Along with incoming defense secretary Robert Gates, Baker's group marks the return of policymakers from the first President Bush and, in the words of The Australian, "the first steps toward a new policy."

Skepticism about the Baker group has united Arab and neoconservative commentators who otherwise agree on little. Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman, editor in chief of The News of Pakistan thinks a fundamental change of course is unlikely. 

"To correct American policy in the Middle East would require something like a political earthquake in both Washington and Israel - and there is no sign as yet of any such upheaval," he wrote. "In both countries, hard-liners are still very much in charge."

"The Iraq war has caused colossal damage in terms of human casualties, material destruction and the squandering of financial resources. It has spread political instability across the region as well as fomenting terrorist violence and sectarian strife. Perhaps the greatest casualty of all has been the loss of America's reputation and moral authority," Rahman wrote. "In spite of this disastrous balance sheet, there is still no consensus in the US that the invasion and occupation were a colossal mistake which can only be corrected by a full withdrawal."

Nicola Nasser, a veteran Arab journalist based in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, said both Democrats and Republicans "are expected to play politics more than they will plan policies."]]></description>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/11/futile_ritual_seen_in_us_veto.html?nav=rss_blog">
<title>&#x27;Futile Ritual&#x27; Seen in U.S. Veto on Gaza Attack</title>
<link>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/11/futile_ritual_seen_in_us_veto.html?nav=rss_blog</link>
<description><![CDATA[The U.S. veto of a U.N. Security Council resolution condemning the Israeli attack that killed 20 Palestinian civilians last week has incensed Middle East commentators, including some Israelis.

"This resolution does not display an evenhanded characterization of the recent events in Gaza," said U.N. Ambassador John Bolton on Saturday. A spokesman for Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas replied that the veto "will encourage Israel to continue its escalation against the Palestinian people."

The Palestinian victims, including seven children and four women, died in an artillery barrage on  the town of Beit Hanoun. They lived in an apartment building a few hundred yards away from an area where Palestinian militants had fired homemade rockets at Israel 12 hours earlier. Israel said the killings were unintentional results of a "technical failure" and expressed regrets.

Within hours of the veto, Arab foreign ministers meeting in Cairo said they would seek to send funds for the rebuilding of Beit Hanoun, despite a Western-led ban on financial aid to the Hamas-led Palestinian government, according to the BBC.

The Beit Hanoun tragedy has become yet another chapter in what the Agence France Presse called Washington's "troubled Middle East policy." 

While most countries condemned the attacks, "the American position is different," wrote the London-based Al Hayat (in Arabic). "Condoleezza Rice expressed, in a phone conversation, her 'regrets' to the Palestinian president, but this didn't prevent the US representative in the UN from opposing the veto in the Security Council...It's clear that there is a problem in the White House's political thought. How does the White House keep silent in front of the massacre of women and children by the Israeli forces and accuses Islam of being 'fascist'?"  

Al Rai, the Jordanian daily, expressed similar disillusionment at the U.S. veto. 

"The American veto against the resolution condemning the Israeli massacre in Beit Hanoun is disappointing. It is disappointing for all those who wished that the Bush administration, after its defeat in the recent elections, will readjust its policy," Al Rai's editors said (in Arabic). 

"The American veto can be justified neither morally nor politically. It is all the more unjustified that the initiators of the resolution accepted all the remarks and amendments proposed by the member states. They even added an article condemning the launching of the Palestinian rockets on Israel. But all this didn't convince Washington nor its delegate in the UN, John Bolton."

'Futile Rituals'

For some commentators, the scenario was all too familiar.

"We have seen the same futile rituals repeat and reproduce themselves ad nauseam," wrote Khalid Amayreh in the pro-Hamas Palestine Information Center Web site. ]]></description>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/11/in_rumsfelds_fall_hope_and_rec.html?nav=rss_blog">
<title>In Rumsfeld&#x27;s Fall, Hope and Reckoning</title>
<link>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/11/in_rumsfelds_fall_hope_and_rec.html?nav=rss_blog</link>
<description><![CDATA[Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld's resignation is being welcomed the world over as a sure sign that U.S. policy on Iraq will change.

Iranians expressed hope for avoiding confrontation with the United States as a result of Rumsfeld's departure, according to an AP report from Tehran. The Guardian's reporter in Tehran sent back a similar dispatch: "Sources close to the Islamic republic's theocratic leadership said yesterday that the replacement as US defence secretary of the hawkish Mr Rumsfeld by the more emollient Robert Gates improved the chances of direct talks between Tehran and Washington."

In Europe, Spiegel Online reports that some German newspapers worry that a more multilateral America will expect more military support from Europe. 
 
There are two different schools of thought in the international media about what Rumsfeld's departure says about America.
 
I. A New America? 
 
More than a few commentators say the Democratic congressional victories that prompted Rumsfeld's resignation show that Americans have finally overcome the trauma of Sept. 11. 
 
Rumsfeld's departure is "the biggest marker of policy change" since the 2001 terror attacks,  writers Greg Sheridan in The Australian.
 
"The citizens of the USA have finally emerged from the stupor  into which they descended after 11 September and have voted for a change of
direction in the Iraq war, but also in economic and social policy," said El Pais in Spain. 
 
"For the Americans the new balance of power in Washington means the chance of finally moving on from 9/11. It has become abundantly clear that anger is not a good counsel and war not the best weapon against terror," wrote Evita Neefs in the center-right Belgian daily De Standaard.
 
But the Arab News in Saudi Arabia questioned whether American has changed: "When US arms seemed to be triumphant, Bush enjoyed his highest poll ratings. But Americans don't like losers. That is why they delivered their devastating verdict on the administration and the Republicans who once backed it so enthusiastically. There was however little reference in all the campaign rhetoric to the horrors Bush has brought to Iraqis, proving that even now, Americans can only see this disaster in their own insular terms," the editors wrote Thursday. 
 
The Jordan Times said "Americans have realised that more and more people given the choice between being with or against the bully are choosing the latter.
 
"We can only hope that this is the beginning of a long overdue realisation among Americans that neither are they alone in this world nor do they have a monopoly on the right values or the use of force," declared the Amman daily.]]></description>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/11/sandinistas_set_to_join_chavez.html?nav=rss_blog">
<title>Chavez Influence Seen in Ortega Victory</title>
<link>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/11/sandinistas_set_to_join_chavez.html?nav=rss_blog</link>
<description><![CDATA[The victory of Sandinista candidate Daniel Ortega in Nicaragua is likely boost to the so-called Bolivarian axis in Latin America, according to Central American media.

Hugo Chavez's dream of building an anti-U.S. bloc in the Americas had lost some of its luster in recent months and the defeat of leftist candidates in Peru and Mexico suggested to some that the populist crusade of the Venezuela's president was losing momentum. 

But Ortega's victory has given Chavez new cause to celebrate  -- and Central America's conservative media cause for consternation. 

"The almost sure victory of the 'brother Sandinista' to whom Chavez has promised cheap petroleum, will be a relief for the Venezuelan president who had just suffered a reverse in United Nations, where he failed to win a permanent chair in the [U.N.] Security Council," reported the Agence France-Presse in Managua's leftist Nueva Diario.

Fidel Castro, Chavez's ailing ideological patron, congratulated Ortega on his "magnificent victory."

The "Chavez Factor" loomed large in the campaign, according to El Universal in Caracas. Neither Chavez nor the United States made any pretense of neutrality or non-interference. Chavez said of Ortega, "I want him to win." U.S. officials made clear they supported Montealeagre.

La Prensa Grafica (in Spanish) in El Salvador did not have to mention Chavez to see his shadow in the Nicaraguan results.

"Populism is a regional threat," said the San Salvador daily. 

"The Sandinista victory in Nicaragua and diverse developments in the region in recent times are a without a doubt a response to the fragility of our democracies and the necessity to search for alternatives  without going beyond democratic norms," the newspaper said. "Along this road, the temptations of the past are resurgent, chief among them populism."

La Prensa defined populism as "using the needs of the people as lockpick to force social and institutional structures in provide for those that practice it." Ortega campaigned on a promise to tame "wild capitalism" and boost the country's poor majority. 

Chavez predicted Ortega's government will "join the Bolivarian project for regional unity," according to La Tribuna in Honduras, 

But the Tegucigalpa daily also asserted that the Sandinista party's agenda today is "more 'Daniel-ism' than revolution."

Ortega made a point to show voters the new politician he has become since rising to fame as the Sandanista who toppled a pro-U.S. dictatorship and then battled U.S.-backed rebels in the 1980s. The Toronto Globe and Mail called Ortega "an old rebel with a new cause."]]></description>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/11/in_arab_world_bitterness_over.html?nav=rss_blog">
<title>In Arab World, Bitterness Over Hussein Verdict</title>
<link>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/11/in_arab_world_bitterness_over.html?nav=rss_blog</link>
<description><![CDATA[News of Saddam Hussein's death sentence has drawn mixed reaction from throughout the world. But in the so-called "Arab Street," the reaction has been a unified bitterness. 

Azzaman and Al-Sabah, two of the biggest circulation papers in Baghdad, published news stories about the death penalty for the former president -- but no commentary. Inside the Green Zone, U.S. Ambassador Zalmay Khalilizad hailed "an important milestone." Outside, it is too dangerous to express a viewpoint one way or the other. 

Elsewhere in the Arab online media, the sentencing of Hussein was seen less as a victory for the rule of law than a defeat for the United States. In neighboring Jordan, a commentator for Al-Rai (in Arabic), the country's largest circulation newspaper, called Hussein's sentence, a "comedy in the death's quagmire." 

"The problem is not the death sentence. The US soldiers could have shot him in the first minutes of his arrest. But the American political theater, with its artists, designers and directors, decided to put on trial the Baath party, Saddam and the Arab political system since Faisal I. ... Now the entire scenario has collapsed and the author, the director, the artists find themselves caught up in the Iraqi quagmire.... If the sentence is not a comedy, what is the definition of this word?" 

In Syria, where the government controls the media and the democracy movement has been silenced by the chaos in Iraq, the news agency Sana reiterated European criticism of the proceedings.

In Egypt, editors of the state-controlled Egypt Gazette said, "Though very few are ready to shed tears for the condemned ex-strongman, the death verdict against Saddam is unlikely to improve either the situation in Iraq or the US predicament there. The opposite is true. Saddam's supporters may exploit the perceived blunders of the US-sponsored court to add to Americans' woes." 

ascend to power within a year, sources tell Al Ahram Weekly.) -->

"Once again, a false victory in Iraq is exploited by the American establishment for the internal use," a commentator said in La Presse (in French), a pro-government daily in Tunisia. "Surprisingly, the condemnation of Saddam Hussein intervened just 48 hours prior to the November 7 mid-term elections. As expected, the White House congratulated itself, calling it a "historic day for the Iraqi people.'Spokesman Tony Snow said the sentence was 'absolute proof that there is an independent judiciary system in Iraq.'"

La Presse expressed its doubt, quoting criticism of Hussein's trial from Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, and observing that "neither group can be accused of sympathy toward Saddam."

In other coverage:

European leaders are calling for the commutation of Hussein's death sentence to life imprisonment. Even Tony Blair, advocate of the U.S.-led overthrow, broke with the White House in opposing the ex-dictator's execution. 

Spiegel Online reported that Europe's position is both principled and pragmatic: "It is clear that the verdict and its possible application will contribute to and deepen the armed violence and the political and religious polarization in Iraq, bringing with it the almost certain risk that the crisis will spread to the entire region." 

Islam Online, the news site of Egyptian scholar Yusuf Qaradawi, sees the verdict feeding sectarian violence.  

"The timing while perhaps designed to serve a domestic agenda in the United States, could not be worse for Iraq," wrote Firas Al-Atraqchi, a Iraqi-Canadian correspondent. "It comes on the heels of the ever-growing civil war, the humiliation many Iraqis feel over the issue of the Iraqi flag being lowered from official buildings, the fracas over federalism, and the growing understanding that the government of Iraqi Prime Minister Nur Al-Maliki has done little other than hand over the reins of security to the death squads."

***

Tunisian journalist Hmida Ben Romdhane contributed to this post. Romdhane is the editor-in-chief of the international desk of the Tunisian daily newspaper "La Presse." He is with washingtonpost.com for several weeks as part of a two-month fellowship sponsored by the U.S. Department of State and the International Research and Exchanges Board.]]></description>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/11/saddams_sentence_1.html?nav=rss_blog">
<title>Saddam&#x27;s Trial: Farce or Justice?</title>
<link>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/11/saddams_sentence_1.html?nav=rss_blog</link>
<description><![CDATA[The death sentence handed down Sunday for Saddam Hussein's role in the execution of 148 Shiite villagers in 1982 provoked strong media reaction the world over.

The strongest expressions of approval came from two groups who don't often agree: Iranian online commentators and supporters of the U.S.-led invasion in 2003 that lead to Hussein's capture. The sharpest criticism came from Arab observers who saw the trial and verdict as tailored to U.S. interests and from European pundits opposed to the death penalty under all circumstances. 

Few commentators derive much comfort from the decision because of the ongoing chaos in Iraq, according to a BBC media survey. "There  is widespread concern that the violence will continue, or even increase, with one Arab commentator arguing that the world is witnessing the 'crumbling of Iraq,'" said the British news site.

Was Justice Served?

Yes, says the government-dominated media in neighboring Iran which fought an eight-year war with Iraq in the 1980s.

Describing the former Iraqi president as "a criminal of monumental and historic proportions," the Iran News said, "Good riddance Saddam."

"The brave verdict that the judge issued soothed the pains and agonies of the Iranians and Iraqis and will have positive effects for these two countries," said Iran's judiciary chief Ayatollah Hashemi Shahroudi, according to the Fars New Agency. 

In Saudi Arabia, the Arab News also approved, saying, "To have been sentenced to anything less severe would have been not only a travesty -- which much of the trial has been -- but also completely unjust to the thousands whose lives were either cut short or ruined because of the merciless dictator and his dictatorship."

The Gulf News in Qatar welcomed the verdict as "a strong message for other dictators in the region and around the world."

"What the world has witnessed is the end of a trial, conducted in a war zone on behalf of a struggling democracy, in which the defendant was as guilty as sin," said the Daily Telegraph in London. "The death of Saddam is not a sufficient condition for the establishment of democracy in Iraq, but it is certainly a necessary one."

The German financial daily Handelsblatt recalled that at one time Hussein's trial was expected to act "as a catharsis," according to Spiegel Online's translation. "Now, in the face of the increasing violence, the trail "has seemed an unimportant sideshow ... The original aim of self purification has been overtaken by the daily chaos." 

Still, the trial was worthwhile, said the financial daily. "Saddam, who had made himself godlike with his ludicrous personality cult, was shrunk back to normal size in court." 

"This alone made the trial worthwhile. The Kurds should now be given the chance to bring him to justice for crimes against them. The paper counsels that there should be 'no rush to send Saddam to his death ... if at all.'"

The conservative daily Die Welt praised Iraq for being the first Arab country to attempt to "use the law to deal with a terrible dictator and to embark on a new path towards a different future."

But for many in the Middle East and Europe, the verdict served neither justice nor the people of Iraq.
"The sentence was illegal and the court unfair. How could it be otherwise since it was created by the occupier's decision, its judges fleeing or dismissed and the lawyers attacked by the government's death squads?" asked Al Quds Al Arabi, a hardline daily that is critical of the United States and Israel. 

A Court of Chaos

"The sentence was not lawful. The trial was politicized and the outcome known," Khaled Al-Habbas, a Saudi political analyst, told the Saudi Gazette. 

The Khaleej Times said the decision was "victors' justice at its worst."  

"Saddam is the first leader from an Arab and Middle Eastern country to be deposed and put in the dock like an ordinary criminal, " said the Persian Gulf daily. "Which is why it was absolutely critical to make the whole process of trying the former Iraqi leader and his men transparent and completely fair.  Which hasn't been the case in this trial."  ]]></description>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/11/the_cauldron_of_oaxaca.html?nav=rss_blog">
<title>The &#x27;Cauldron of  Oaxaca&#x27;</title>
<link>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/11/the_cauldron_of_oaxaca.html?nav=rss_blog</link>
<description><![CDATA[Brad Will, an American freelance journalist, was filming a street battle in the Mexican city of Oaxaca last Friday when a burst of gunfire took his life. 

The footage he took in the last moments of his life, viewable at indymedia.org, captured the chaos and danger of a long-running conflict that few people outside of Mexico had been paying attention to.  

The deaths of three people, including the 36-year-old activist and freelancer from San Francisco, prompted President Vicente Fox to order federal troops to reclaim the city, a popular tourist destination that has been gripped by protesters demanding the ouster of Gov. Ulises Ruiz for more than five months.

On Sunday, Fox declared that order had been restored. But as The Washington Post's Manuel Roig-Franzia reported, "the president's declaration seemed out of sync with events on the ground."

The burst of violence intensified Mexico's debate about how to deal with protest movements driven by the country's most disaffected and impoverished citizens. As the Oaxaca protests brewed over the summer, Fox found himself at the center of a similar dilemna as thousands camped out in Mexico City's Zocalo in protest of the presidential election results, which gave conservative Felipe Calderon a narrow victory over the leftist Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador. Fox left the protesters alone, but had to ramp up security ahead of a state of the nation speech which he didn't wind up delivering.

Editorialists of La Imparcial, a conservative Oaxaca daily, welcomed the arrival of the federales to rout the demonstrators, whom they called "delinquents." The leftist Mexico city daily La Jornada (in Spanish), meanwhile, called Fox's action "counterproductive repression."

"The grievances boiling in the cauldron of Oaxaca exist across all of Mexico," wrote David Usborne, correspondent for London's Independent newspaper. The country, he said, is "seemingly unable to close the yawning gap between its wealthy and grindingly poor and where full democracy, born only six years ago, remains fragile."

The seizure began with the annual union strike by schoolteachers seeking higher pay and better conditions for their poor students. When Gov. Ruiz sent police to shut down the demonstrations in June, the normally peaceful demonstration was radicalized. The protesters took over the city center and demanded Ruiz's resignation. Ruiz, in the words of U.K. Guardian correspondent Jo Tuckman, is regarded as "as the epitome of political corruption and authoritarianism."]]></description>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/10/firestorm_over_australian_cler.html?nav=rss_blog">
<title>Firestorm Over Australian Cleric&#x27;s Remarks</title>
<link>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/10/firestorm_over_australian_cler.html?nav=rss_blog</link>
<description><![CDATA[An Australian cleric's comparison of Muslim women who forgo the veil to pieces of "uncovered meat" has sparked yet another controversy pitting Islamic fundamentalism against Western opinion. 
 
The Australian reported last week that the cleric, Sheik Taj Aldin al-Hilali, made the remarks during a Ramadan sermon in Sydney, telling worshipers that women were "weapons" used by "Satan" to control men and alluding "to the infamous Sydney gang rapes, suggesting the attackers were not entirely to blame."

The furor that followed evoked coverage of England's recent debate about the niqab, Germany's distress over the cancellation of an opera depicting the beheading of Muhammad, anger over Pope Benedict's remarks on Islam and the worldwide controversy over Danish cartoons mocking the Muslim prophet. Novelist Salman Rushdie, himself facing a fatwah over his impious fiction, told The Independent (by subscription) in London he feared such controversies might signal "the surrender of the West."

But yesterday, it was Sheik Hilali who surrendered.

In the face of widespread condemnation from the media and Muslim groups, Hilali recanted and resigned his position as imam of the Lakemba Mosque in Sydney, citing health problems.

The report in The Australian, which is owned by conservative media magnate Rupert Murdoch, was based on a tape of a sermon Hilali delivered in September. The Special Broadcasting Service, which touts itself as the news source for multicultural Australia, did an independent translation  of Hilali's remarks.

"In the religious address on adultery to about 500 worshippers in Sydney last month, Sheik Hilali said: 'If you take out uncovered meat and place it outside on the street, or in the garden or in the park, or in the backyard without a cover, and the cats come and eat it ... whose fault is it, the cats or the uncovered meat? The uncovered meat is the problem.'"

The reaction to Hilali's words was swift. ]]></description>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/10/tensions_in_latin_america_over.html?nav=rss_blog">
<title>Tensions in Latin America Over a Wall, a U.N. Seat and a Chunk of Land</title>
<link>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/10/tensions_in_latin_america_over.html?nav=rss_blog</link>
<description><![CDATA[The uneasy relationship between the United States and the rest of the hemisphere reverberates in three stories generating headlines and fueling commentary throughout Latin America -- the final approval of a U.S.-Mexico wall, Hugo Chavez's ongoing fight for a seat at the United Nations, and rumors that have spun out of a visit by Jenna Bush to Paraguay. 

'The Wall of Lies'

With President Bush's signing of legislation authorizing the construction of a 700-mile border barrier, the widespread Latin American opposition to "el muro" has returned in force. 

Peruvian novelist Mario Vargas Llosa, politically conservative and often pro-American, is among the most caustic critics. Writing in Peru's El Comercio (and reprinted in El Pais of Spain and La Opinion  in Los Angeles), Vargas Llosa flatly predict that "the wall of lies" will never be completed. 

"The seven billion dollars that the wall of the lies will cost would serve much more effectively, with respect to illegal immigration, if instead of being squandered on a cement fiction that will soon have more holes than a gruyere cheese, was spent on factories or credits to create jobs on the other side of the border...But all this belongs to the dominion of the strict reality and it is well  known that human beings -- even gringos, who pride themselves on being so pragmatic -- often prefer the magic of the fiction to the crude life as he is," he wrote. 

Google's translation is crude, but gives the flavor of Vargas Llosa's polemic. 
 
Mexican commentators are especially negative. Talli Nauman of El Universal calls the fence, "a chicken-hearted response by weak-kneed U.S. elected representatives who do not care about resolving migration conflicts."]]></description>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/10/more_on_counting_civilian_casu.html?nav=rss_blog">
<title>More on Counting Civilian Casualties</title>
<link>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/2006/10/more_on_counting_civilian_casu.html?nav=rss_blog</link>
<description><![CDATA[The online debate continues about a recent report in a British medical journal estimating 655,000 civilian deaths since the U.S. led invasion in March 2003. After my column on the study last week, lead author Gilbert Burnham defended its methodology in a discussion with readers.

Three British academics argue in Science.com (by subscription) that the study suffers from "main street bias." 

"By only surveying houses that are located on cross streets next to main roads or on the main road itself," wrote co-author and Oxford University physics professor Sean Gourley in a press release. "The study inflates casualty estimates since conflict events such as car bombs, drive-by shootings artillery strikes on insurgent positions, and marketplace explosions gravitate toward the same neighborhood types that the researchers surveyed."

But Rebecca Goldin, writing for Statistical Assessment Service (stats.org) at George Mason University, rejected such criticism, saying the JHU study used statistical weighting methods that took into account the location of interviewees.

"The methods used by this study are the only scientific methods we have for discovering death rates in war torn countries without the infrastructure to report all deaths through central means," she wrote. "Instead of dismissing over half a million dead people as a political ploy as did Anthony Cordesman of the Center for Strategic & International Studies in Washington, we ought to embrace science as opening our eyes to a tragedy whose death scale has been vastly underestimated until now."

I first wrote about media coverage of civilian casualties in September 2004, quoting the Gulf News' observation that "an eerie silence" surrounded the subject. Two years and thousands of civilian deaths later, the silence has been replaced by serious debate. ]]></description>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>